• Zuckerman says nothing of the familiar shrieks, gasps, anxious clutches and shivers that almost everyone has either experienced or observed during horror narratives.
  
•  Ignoring the fear response or over-emphasising the enjoyment of horror can lead to conclusions such as that the central reward that horror consumers crave is a ‘good story well told’ or that they are primarily interested in the logical/ratiocination aspects of tracing horror narrative plot; that horror consumers suffer from psychological illnesses or defects such as persecution or helplessness complexes, antisocial tendencies, varieties of fanaticism, that they are essentially narcissistic or just demented people who celebrate seeing helpless victims destroyed by monsters (human or otherwise); that horror narrative comprises ‘alternate worlds’ or ‘thresholds’ in or at which horror consumers confront or simply experience ‘others’ (human, semi-human, or otherwise), returns to infantile experience, encounters with death, etc.; or that horror tales are dystopian allegories that illuminate a variety of wicked and oppressive corners of culture and society (in the family or community, among different races and peoples, between genders, etc.).
• The Definition of Horror – ‘painful and intense fear, dread, or dismay; intense aversion or repugnance’ (2), combined with a common-sense or intuitive understanding of what horror ‘really’ is, is necessary or helpful. The borders of horror are extremely porous, and to attempt to anchor a specific definition beyond the basics can be limiting, and probably at best only partially accurate. In the varieties of horror narrative, we regularly find that one person’s ‘horror’ is another’s ‘thriller’, is another’s ‘drama’, is another’s ‘science fiction’, is another’s ‘fantasy’, is another’s ‘fairy tale’ (‘most fairy tales…may be considered bona fide horror stories’ write Zillmann and Gibson.

• Marvin Zuckerman’s research incorporates the interrelated elements that occur during fear emotions, as described above, and posits how they are manifested in sensation seeking, a battery of human traits that is ‘central to a basic dimension of personality’ (Behavioral Expressions, p. 373). Sensation seeking is defined by Zuckerman as ‘the seeking of varied, novel, complex and intense sensations and experiences, and the willingness to take physical, social, legal, and financial risks for the sake of such experience’ (Behavioral Expressions, p. 27). (4) In the remainder of this paper, I will treat horror consumers as sensation seekers (as Zuckerman and others have done), occasionally reminding the reader of this.
• Laura Mulvey- stated that she intended to use Freud and Lacan’s concepts as a “political weapon.” She then used some of their concepts to argue that the cinematic apparatus of classical Hollywood cinema inevitably put the spectator in a masculine subject position, with the figure of the woman on screen as the object of desire. In the era of classical Hollywood cinema, viewers were encouraged to identify with the protagonist of the film, who tended to be a man. Meanwhile, Hollywood female characters of the 1950s and 60s were, according to Mulvey, coded with “to-be-looked-at-ness.” Mulvey suggests that there were two distinct modes of the male gaze of this era: “voyeuristic” (i.e. seeing women as ‘whores’) and “fetishistic” (i.e. seeing women as ‘madonnas’).
• Mulvey argued that the only way to annihilate the “patriarchal” Hollywood system was to radically challenge and re-shape the filminess strategies of classical Hollywood with alternative feminist methods. She called for a new feminist avant-garden film making that would rupture the magic and pleasure of classical Hollywood film making. She wrote, “It is said that analyzing pleasure or beauty annihilates it. That is the intention of this article.”
• Critics of the article objected to the fact that her argument implied the impossibility of genuine ‘feminine’ enjoyment of the classical Hollywood cinema, and to the fact that her argument did not seem to take into account spectatorships that were not organised along the normative lines of gender. For example, a metaphoric ‘transvestism’ might be possible when viewing a film – a male viewer might enjoy a ‘feminine’ point-of-view provided by a film, or vice versa; gay, lesbian and bisexual spectatorships might also be different. Her article also did not take into account the findings of the later wave of media audience studies on the complex nature of fan cultures and their interaction with stars.
• Mulvey discusses several different types of spectatorship that occur while viewing a film. Viewing a film involves subconsciously engaging in the understanding of male and female roles. The “three different looks”, as they are referred to, explain just exactly how films are viewed in relation to phallocentrism. The first “look” refers to the camera as it records the actual events of the film. The second “look” describes the nearly voyeuristic act of the audience as one engages in watching the film itself. Lastly, the third “look” refers to the characters that interact with one another throughout the film.
• Vladimir Propp broke up fairy tales into sections. Through these sections he was able to define the tale into a series of sequences that occurred within the Russian fairytale.
• There are 31 functions:

1. ABSENTATION: A member of a family leaves the security of the home environment. This may be the hero or some other member of the family that the hero will later need to rescue. This division of the cohesive family injects initial tension into the storyline. The hero may also be introduced here, often being shown as an ordinary person.
2. INTERDICTION: An interdiction is addressed to the hero (‘don’t go there’, ‘don’t do this’). The hero is warned against some action (given an ‘interdiction’).
3. VIOLATION of INTERDICTION. The interdiction is violated (villain enters the tale). This generally proves to be a bad move and the villain enters the story, although not necessarily confronting the hero. Perhaps they are just a lurking presence or perhaps they attack the family whilst the hero is away.
4. RECONNAISSANCE: The villain makes an attempt at reconnaissance (either villain tries to find the children/jewels etc.; or intended victim questions the villain). The villain (often in disguise) makes an active attempt at seeking information, for example searching for something valuable or trying to actively capture someone. They may speak with a member of the family who innocently divulges information. They may also seek to meet the hero, perhaps knowing already the hero is special in some way.
5. DELIVERY: The villain gains information about the victim. The villain’s seeking now pays off and he or she now acquires some form of information, often about the hero or victim. Other information can be gained, for example about a map or treasure location.
6. TRICKERY: The villain attempts to deceive the victim to take possession of victim or victim’s belongings (trickery; villain disguised, tries to win confidence of victim). The villain now presses further, often using the information gained in seeking to deceive the hero or victim in some way, perhaps appearing in disguise. This may include capture of the victim, getting the hero to give the villain something or persuading them that the villain is actually a friend and thereby gaining collaboration.
7. COMPLICITY: Victim taken in by deception, unwittingly helping the enemy. The trickery of the villain now works and the hero or victim naively acts in a way that helps the villain. This may range from providing the villain with something (perhaps a map or magical weapon) to actively working against good people (perhaps the villain has persuaded the hero that these other people are actually bad).
8. VILLAINY or LACK: Villain causes harm/injury to family member (by abduction, theft of magical agent, spoiling crops, plunders in other forms, causes a disappearance, expels someone, casts spell on someone, substitutes child etc., commits murder, imprisons/detains someone, threatens forced marriage, provides nightly torments); Alternatively, a member of family lacks something or desires something (magical potion etc.). There are two options for this function, either or both of which may appear in the story. In the first option, the villain causes some kind of harm, for example carrying away a victim or the desired magical object (which must be then be retrieved). In the second option, a sense of lack is identified, for example in the hero’s family or within a community, whereby something is identified as lost or something becomes desirable for some reason, for example a magical object that will save people in some way.
9. MEDIATION: Misfortune or lack is made known, (hero is dispatched, hears call for help etc./ alternative is that victimized hero is sent away, freed from imprisonment). The hero now discovers the act of villainy or lack, perhaps finding their family or community devastated or caught up in a state of anguish and woe.
10. BEGINNING COUNTER-ACTION: Seeker agrees to, or decides upon counter-action. The hero now decides to act in a way that will resolve the lack, for example finding a needed magical item, rescuing those who are captured or otherwise defeating the villain. This is a defining moment for the hero as this is the decision that sets the course of future actions and by which a previously ordinary person takes on the mantle of heroism.
11. DEPARTURE: Hero leaves home;
12. FIRST FUNCTION OF THE DONOR: Hero is tested, interrogated, attacked etc., preparing the way for his/her receiving magical agent or helper (donor);
13. HERO’S REACTION: Hero reacts to actions of future donor (withstands/fails the test, frees captive, reconciles disputants, performs service, uses adversary’s powers against him);
14. RECEIPT OF A MAGICAL AGENT: Hero acquires use of a magical agent (directly transferred, located, purchased, prepared, spontaneously appears, eaten/drunk, help offered by other characters);
15. GUIDANCE: Hero is transferred, delivered or led to whereabouts of an object of the search;
16. STRUGGLE: Hero and villain join in direct combat;
17. BRANDING: Hero is branded (wounded/marked, receives ring or scarf);
18. VICTORY: Villain is defeated (killed in combat, defeated in contest, killed while asleep, banished);
19. LIQUIDATION: Initial misfortune or lack is resolved (object of search distributed, spell broken, slain person revived, captive freed);
20. RETURN: Hero returns;
21. PURSUIT: Hero is pursued (pursuer tries to kill, eat, undermine the hero);
22. RESCUE: Hero is rescued from pursuit (obstacles delay pursuer, hero hides or is hidden, hero transforms unrecognisably, hero saved from attempt on his/her life);
23. UNRECOGNIZED ARRIVAL: Hero unrecognized, arrives home or in another country;
24. UNFOUNDED CLAIMS: False hero presents unfounded claims;
25. DIFFICULT TASK: Difficult task proposed to the hero (trial by ordeal, riddles, test of strength/endurance, other tasks);
26. SOLUTION: Task is resolved;
27. RECOGNITION: Hero is recognized (by mark, brand, or thing given to him/her);
28. EXPOSURE: False hero or villain is exposed;
29. TRANSFIGURATION: Hero is given a new appearance (is made whole, handsome, new garments etc.);
30. PUNISHMENT: Villain is punished;
31. WEDDING: Hero marries and ascends the throne (is rewarded/promoted).

Todorov- Upon choosing whether the event was real or imaginary, Todorov says that we enter into the genres of uncanny and marvelous. In the fantastic uncanny, the event that occurs is actually an illusion of some sort. The “laws of reality” remain intact and also provide a rational explanation for the fantastic event. Todorov gives examples of dreams, drugs, illusions of the senses, madness, etc. as things that could explain a fantastic/supernatural event. In the fantastic marvelous, the supernatural event that occurs has actually taken place and therefore the “laws of reality” have to be changed to explain the event. Only if the implied reader cannot opt for one or the other possibility, the text is purely fantastic.
Reference: